<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Scrotum&#8221; Dangerous for Children</title>
	<link>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/</link>
	<description>kellysue.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: kellysue</title>
		<link>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3315</link>
		<author>kellysue</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3315</guid>
		<description>Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dietsch</title>
		<link>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3177</link>
		<author>dietsch</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3177</guid>
		<description>Of course, I probably deserve that for reading &lt;em&gt;New York&lt;/em&gt; and its bloggy offspring, but I get bored some times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I probably deserve that for reading <em>New York</em> and its bloggy offspring, but I get bored some times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dietsch</title>
		<link>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3175</link>
		<author>dietsch</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>That's pretty sad, but here's something equally sad: the NYTimes had a piece on this a week or so ago, and so much of the blog coverage (I can't bring myself to say blogosph...no! can't!) focused on "Heh Heh Heh, the Times said scrotum!"

Case in point:

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/02/a_brief_history_of_times_genit_1.html

Pretty much everybody sucks, really, except us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty sad, but here&#8217;s something equally sad: the NYTimes had a piece on this a week or so ago, and so much of the blog coverage (I can&#8217;t bring myself to say blogosph&#8230;no! can&#8217;t!) focused on &#8220;Heh Heh Heh, the Times said scrotum!&#8221;</p>
<p>Case in point:</p>
<p><a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/02/a_brief_history_of_times_genit_1.html" rel="nofollow">http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2007/02/a_brief_history_of_times_genit_1.html</a></p>
<p>Pretty much everybody sucks, really, except us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theron</title>
		<link>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3132</link>
		<author>Theron</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>It's a sad state of affairs when someone responsible for disseminating information nationally brags that she censors books - children's books, no less.  (What are the odds her daughter has something pierced by age 11?) Of course, this is The View - not World News Tonight...but still, it speaks to the current moral/political climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sad state of affairs when someone responsible for disseminating information nationally brags that she censors books - children&#8217;s books, no less.  (What are the odds her daughter has something pierced by age 11?) Of course, this is The View - not World News Tonight&#8230;but still, it speaks to the current moral/political climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney</title>
		<link>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3128</link>
		<author>Courtney</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kellysue.com/blog/2007/02/28/scrotum-dangerous-for-children/#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>You should have seen Barbara Walters and her cohorts discussing it on The View (which I really don't watch, it was on when I turned the tv on and they immediately started talking about this).  

What's-her-face, the stupid, young blonde one, said that she ALTERS the books she reads to her 2 year old daughter.  Actually takes a black Sharpie to them and changes the text.  She whipped out Babar and said she wouldn't read it to her daughter because Babar marries his cousin.  She was ridiculous.

The rest of them, Barbara Walters included, engaged in a spirited discussion of what word would possibly be acceptable.  The guy in charge of the bleep button was working overtime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have seen Barbara Walters and her cohorts discussing it on The View (which I really don&#8217;t watch, it was on when I turned the tv on and they immediately started talking about this).  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s-her-face, the stupid, young blonde one, said that she ALTERS the books she reads to her 2 year old daughter.  Actually takes a black Sharpie to them and changes the text.  She whipped out Babar and said she wouldn&#8217;t read it to her daughter because Babar marries his cousin.  She was ridiculous.</p>
<p>The rest of them, Barbara Walters included, engaged in a spirited discussion of what word would possibly be acceptable.  The guy in charge of the bleep button was working overtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
